Recent report by the Debt Relief for Green and Inclusive Recovery Project (DRGR) warned that 47 emerging and developing market economies may struggle to allocate funds for climate adaptation and development without risking default in the next five years.
The annual World Bank and IMF meetings have concluded, leaving behind a sense of urgency and concern. Despite the pressing need to mobilize trillions of dollars for combating climate change, these high-profile gatherings failed to produce a concrete plan. The absence of a clear climate finance strategy raises critical questions about our ability to address the global climate crisis.
The Missing Climate Finance Blueprint
At the heart of the issue lies the lack of a robust climate finance plan. As the world grapples with rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and ecological disruptions, the urgency to allocate substantial resources cannot be overstated. However, the World Bank and IMF meetings concluded without a definitive roadmap for mobilizing the necessary funds.
Key Focus: New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG)
This year, the spotlight was on the New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG). The NCQG represents the annual amount that developed countries must mobilize from 2025 onward to support climate action in developing nations. While rich countries pledged to provide over USD 100 billion annually starting in 2020, they have consistently fallen short of this commitment. The recent analysis revealing negative financial flows into developing countries in 2023—where debt servicing exceeded external financing—adds to the urgency.
Calls for Increased Finance and Debt Challenges
During the spring meetings, discussions between G7 and G20 finance ministers touched upon providing finance to developing countries for climate and development objectives. The Vulnerable Group of Twenty Countries (V20)emphasized the need for increased concessional finance for climate-vulnerable nations. They also urged G7 and high-emitting G21 countries to safeguard the 1.5 degrees Celsius limit.
Meanwhile, the Intergovernmental Group of Twenty-Four on International Monetary Affairs and Development (G24) called for reforms to ensure timely assistance to vulnerable nations. They also advocated for reforming the G20 Common Framework to support countries facing debt distress.
Also Read: Central Bank Digital Currency : A Payments Perspective by World Bank, 2021
World Bank’s Hopeful Outlook
World Bank President Ajay Banga expressed hope that donor contributions could add up to an additional USD 100 billion through the International Development Association (IDA). The Bank has been actively seeking ways to support low-income countries with very low-cost financing and grants. Shareholders are expected to pledge to the IDA before the replenishment conference in December. However, Banga clarified that the Bank has no intention of halting investments in gas projects.
IMF’s Debt Warning
IMF Chief Kristalina Georgieva highlighted the grim reality of the global economy, which has lost USD 3.3 trillion since 2020. She pointed out that the poorest countries allocate over 14 percent of their budgets to debt payments, with interest rate hikes exacerbating debt servicing costs. A recent report by the Debt Relief for Green and Inclusive Recovery Project (DRGR) warned that 47 emerging and developing market economies may struggle to allocate funds for climate adaptation and development without risking default in the next five years.
In summary, the World Bank and IMF meetings underscore the urgent need for decisive action on climate finance. As the world looks ahead to the United Nations climate conference (COP29) in Azerbaijan, the focus must shift from rhetoric to tangible commitments. The trillions needed to combat climate change cannot remain elusive; they are essential for safeguarding our planet’s future.
Source: Sluggish progress on climate finance at World Bank, IMF meetings
Discover more from NewNerve
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.